Megan Thee Stallion’s attorneys blasted Milagro Gramz’s judicial bias declare as a social media concept aimed toward erasing her $75,000 judgment.
Megan Thee Stallion’s attorneys are firing again onerous at Milagro Gramz’s latest authorized argument, submitting papers this week calling Gramz’s choose bias declare a concept she discovered on social media.
Gramz desires the court docket to wipe out the $75,000 judgment she owes Megan Thee Stallion after final yr’s verdict. She first raised the declare earlier this month, arguing Decide Cecilia Altonaga’s husband works at a legislation agency tied to Roc Nation.
Different attorneys at that agency, Holland & Knight, signify Roc Nation CEO Desiree Perez in a totally separate lawsuit earlier than a special choose.
Be part of Us
AllHipHop’s Day by day Information Service
Delivering information to inboxes since 1999. We break it. They take it. Get it first, straight from AllHipHop.
Megan’s attorneys say none of that touches this case in any respect.
They level out Mencio has by no means appeared within the lawsuit and Holland & Knight doesn’t signify Megan right here. Perez isn’t a celebration both, and her separate case is being dealt with by a completely completely different choose.
Megan’s staff additionally says Gramz sat on this argument for months earlier than elevating it. They declare the entire concept got here from a social media submit revealed again in September 2025, seven weeks earlier than the trial even began.
Milagro Gramz litigated via the decision, the judgment, and a failed bid to delay fee with out ever mentioning it.
Megan’s staff says none of this constitutes the extraordinary circumstances the legislation requires to overturn a ultimate judgment. They argue Gramz is simply recycling the identical damaged protection a choose already rejected final month.
Gramz leans on a 1988 Supreme Court docket case, Liljeberg, to assist her concept. Megan’s attorneys say that case really helps their facet, for the reason that choose in it personally had a direct monetary stake within the consequence. Nothing like that exists right here, they argue, since neither the choose nor her husband positive aspects something from this case.
Megan Thee Stallion has been outspoken concerning the case for the reason that verdict was reinstated in Might. She mentioned she felt grateful the reality received out after the choose restored the jury’s full verdict.
Gramz’s attraction is already pending earlier than the Eleventh Circuit, which usually limits what the decrease court docket can do. Megan’s staff says the choose can deny the bias declare outright beneath a rule overlaying pending appeals, with out ready on the appeals court docket.
Gramz’s personal submitting by no means asks the choose to step apart from something going ahead, solely to erase the judgments she already misplaced.
