Mary J. Blige Loses Try To Have $5M Lawsuit Filed By Misa Heard In Particular Courtroom



Mary J. Blige was blocked from shifting Misa Hylton’s $5 million lawsuit to a enterprise court docket after a choose dominated the case belongs in civil court docket.

Mary J. Blige’s try and switch a $5 million lawsuit filed by Misa Hylton to a New York court docket that handles advanced enterprise disputes failed as a choose dominated the case didn’t meet the necessities for the specialised venue.

Blige’s authorized group argued the case, centered on allegations that she interfered with Hylton’s administration deal involving rapper Vado, was too intricate for traditional civil court docket.

They claimed the lawsuit concerned “advanced” points equivalent to California regulation, contract enforcement and company standing.

Nonetheless, Choose Suzanne J. Adams rejected the movement, stating that the claims have been tied to leisure and artist administration agreements, not the kind of industrial dealings the court docket’s Industrial Division was designed to deal with.

In her ruling, Adams wrote that “the complexity of the case, the selection of regulation points, and the quantity in controversy don’t warrant switch to the Industrial Division.”

The lawsuit, filed in April 2025, accuses Mary J. Blige of pressuring Vado to desert his settlement with Hylton’s M.I.S.A. Administration in favor of signing with Blige’s label, Stunning Life Productions.

Hylton alleges Blige withheld album releases and touring alternatives from Vado until he lower ties along with her.

Hylton is looking for $5 million in damages, in addition to an injunction to forestall Blige from interfering in future enterprise relationships.

The criticism additionally names Blige’s head of safety, whom Hylton claims is her boyfriend, and accuses him of warning Vado that he’d “lose out on alternatives” if he stayed with Hylton.

Blige has dismissed the claims as “patently frivolous” and “meritless,” suggesting the lawsuit is a private assault designed to drive a settlement.

Her attorneys argue that Hylton’s firm will not be a legitimate company and that she lacks the right licensing to function as a expertise agent.

Blige can also be looking for sanctions towards Hylton and her lawyer, alleging the go well with was filed for publicity and leverage.

Hylton’s lawyer mentioned they tried to resolve the dispute privately, however turned to the courts when Blige’s group stopped responding.

As of late July 2025, the case stays lively in civil court docket, with Blige pushing for dismissal and Hylton standing agency on her claims.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *