Milagro Gramz’s Request To Delay Paying Megan Thee Stallion Denied


A woman with curly dark hair wearing a revealing, sparkling dress posing in front of a large white circular backdrop.
Supply: JC Olivera/WireImage / JC Olivera/WireImage

Megan Thee Stallion acquired one other authorized W this week, as blogger Milagro Gramz has been ordered to pay up instantly.

In a call obtained by Complicated on Monday (June 29), Choose Cecilia M. Altonaga denied Gramz’s request to carry off on paying the $75K judgment to Meg in her defamation case till after her attraction.

Final 12 months, Gramz (actual identify Milagro Elizabeth Cooper) was discovered chargeable for teaming up with incarcerated rapper Tory Lanez to harass and defame the Houston rapper. Amongst different issues, Gramz promoted a sexually express deepfake video of Megan to her followers.

Earlier this month, Gramz claimed in court docket that paying the total judgment would overwhelmingly have an effect on her monetary safety. In court docket filings, she stated she is self-employed and that her earnings fluctuates month to month. 

“I don’t possess substantial liquid belongings and wouldn’t have the monetary assets vital to instantly fulfill the judgment,” she wrote. 

As well as, the blogger claimed that the case raises “critical authorized questions,” and that she has a very good shot at a profitable attraction. 

Sadly for her, the decide didn’t purchase it.

In her ruling, Choose Altonaga says that “the Courtroom has no dependable foundation to judge Defendant’s funds. She says that there was no proof to show that Gramz could be in monetary misery if she paid the $75K now.

As for Gramz’s attraction, the decide says that she failed to point out “any probability of success.”

“She merely argues that her attraction issues ‘vital points relating to post-trial rulings, the reinstatement of the defamation verdict, and different points,’ with out explaining why these issues are more likely to resolve in her favor,”

Choose Altonaga continued. “Even when the Courtroom thought of these arguments, Defendant gives merely generalized disagreement with the jury’s verdict and the Courtroom’s post-trial rulings, which isn’t a displaying that she is more likely to succeed on attraction.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *